Using Big Data Analytics to prevent crimes the "Minority Report" way
Posted by Thomas Maydon
March 17, 2016
It’s been almost 15 years since we saw the future of crime prevention in “Minority Report” – but today, we are beginning to see those then fictitious yet fantastical methods of predicting and preventing crime being implemented in various parts of the world. I’ll briefly mention three examples below of how analytics is already being used to prevent crime today before going into more detail on a fourth example: using analytics to prevent a criminal from re-offending.
1. PrePol: Identifying crime “Hot Spots”
In Los Angeles and in England “predictive policing” (“PrePol”) has been deployed for over two decades. It has of course evolved over this time. Today PrePol utilises algorithms to identify crime “hot-spots”. The results have been positive. In double blinded trials they have been twice as good as traditional methods of prevention.
2. Smart Grid Infrastructure: Identifying and Predicting electricity theft
3. Big Data Surveillance in China reaching Robocop scenario
Recently Bloomberg reported on the Chinese government’s efforts to help prevent crime through Big Data surveillance in a country where data privacy laws are limited. Under government mandate the country’s largest state-run defense contractor is building an analytics software platform that will be able to cross-reference information from bank accounts, jobs, hobbies, consumption patterns, and footage from surveillance cameras to identify potential terrorists. As of the 1st of January of this year, Chinese authorities have been granted access to bank accounts, telecommunications and a national network of surveillance cameras called - oddly enough - Skynet. Picture a world where police officers wearing augmented reality glasses are able to identify each individual in a crowd.
Upon identification of individuals, everything from their medical records, social media activity, demographic data and police records is pulled and run through an algorithm. From here a potential perpetrator of a crime is then identified and the police can take or plan their action. This “Robocop” type scenario is no longer so far in the future in China.
4. Machine Learning for Predicting Re-offence
This month the "Journal of Empirical Legal Studies" published a paper which detailed a large study where machine learning had been used to determine whether it could feasibly be used to assist judges in domestic violence arraignment / bail hearings, i.e. should an arrested individual be granted bail or not.
Machine learning is an algorithm that is used to make predictions, but while doing so learns from its predictions and makes adjustments to continually improve the accuracy of its predictions.
In this study, 28,000 domestic violence arraignment hearings were assessed over the period 2007-2011 (observation period). Then those 28,000 individuals were assessed to see whether they had re-offended or not in the next two years (outcome period). The machine looked at over 35 characteristics, including previous convictions and charges, and demographic data, such as age and gender. Random forests (a statistical technique) were built to assess the likelihood of re-offending.
Even with the relatively small amount of data fields used, the outcomes were impressive. Typically the courts would have granted bail to the majority of those at arraignment, and 20% were shown to have re-offended in the next 24 months. The analysis showed that the model could have selected better with only 10% of them re-offending.
In such matters, being able to predict a probability of re-offence is all very well, but the models are not perfect and the errors have significant social consequences. Here courts would need to assess the impact of false-positives: identifying someone as a likely repeat offender (although they are not) and denying them bail, which could cost them their jobs and possibly their homes while being detained. False-negatives - being released on bail and re-offending although the model predicted otherwise - are also noteworthy. Despite the sophistication of the models, they are unlikely to be able to take into account all the subtle information available to a judge.
Supporters however say that mistakes would be made with or without the model and if the model performs better than human intervention alone, it should not be ignored.
This is analogous to credit card transaction fraud models that can also be run using machine learning. A false-positives may lead to freezing of credit cards, which would lead to inconvenience to the credit card holder and a high number of customer services calls. Banks need to determine their threshold for accepting questionable transactions.
Analytics and specifically machine learning are proving to have far-reaching applications not only in industry and commerce, but also in crime-prevention and in the courts. The fighting and management of crime empirically is in its infancy. This study is just one of many on the go.
Image credits:Twentieth Century Fox ("Minority Report" image), Orion Pictures Corp. ("Robocop" and "The Terminator" images)
About the Author, Thomas Maydon
Thomas Maydon is the Head of Credit Solutions at Principa. With over 13 years of experience in the Southern African, West African and Middle Eastern retail credit markets, Tom has primarily been involved in consulting, analytics, credit bureau and predictive modelling services. He has experience in all aspects of the credit life cycle (in multiple industries) including intelligent prospecting, originations, strategy simulation, affordability analysis, behavioural modelling, pricing analysis, collections processes, and provisions (including Basel II) and profitability calculations.