The Data Analytics Blog

Our news and views relating to Data Analytics, Big Data, Machine Learning, and the world of Credit.

All Posts

Collections Resilience post COVID-19 - part 2

December 14, 2020 at 10:15 AM

Principa Decisions (Pty) L

In part one of Collections Resilience Post COVID-19 we looked at the importance of digitalisation and the need to pro-actively identify debtor types through analytics (analytical evolution).

Within this second part of the blog we are going to focus on legislation and scrutiny post Covid-19.

A subject which has received a lot of attention recently, has been the requirement for financial institutions to treat their customers fairly. Even though this has always been an implied principle, The Conduct of Financial Institutions Bill will empower the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), established under the Financial Sector Regulation Act, to set conduct standards and to regulate the operations, culture, product design, selling, marketing, advertising and internal procedures of financial institutions.

As we mentioned in part one, we can segment debtors into three main types, namely financially disorganised; those in financial difficulty and those that are financially distressed. In practice, however, we segment these main types into much smaller groups of similar accounts, or similar debtors.


“The Conduct of Financial Institutions Bill will empower the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), established under the Financial Sector Regulation Act, to set conduct standards and to regulate the operations, culture, product design, selling, marketing, advertising and internal procedures of financial institutions.”


How will The Conduct of Financial Institutions Bill affect the Collections and Recoveries space?


Here are a few questions we are being asked regularly:

  • Does this new bill now imply that all debtors must be treated the same?

No certainly not, but it does imply that even though we assign different tones and types of actions to different account and debtor segments, we need to align the content and intent to “treating the customer fairly”.

  • Does this new bill now imply that financial institutions need to do more from their side in order to treat the customers fairly?

Yes, and we are already seeing it more and more from the larger financial institutions.

As an example:

Regarding affordability of customers or debtors; historically, companies would do an affordability assessment when a new (or in some cases existing) customer applies for a loan, overdraft or credit increase. An assessment was required when a customer required credit, but no assessment was done when that account entered collections.

When entering collections we typically negotiate payment terms, and the only reference we have is the initial affordability assessment and analytical models to determine “probability of payment” or “probability of default” etc.

It is therefore becoming clear that we are not treating the customer or debtor fairly in our approach within collections. Within collections our aim is to “rehabilitate” the account (and therefore the customer). We are there to assist and guide the customer or debtor in order for him or her  To get the account up to date, and improve their credit bureau standing. If we do not assess the customer or debtor’s financial situation within Collections, how can we accept payment terms which could be unaffordable and only lead to further delinquency? Will we be “treating the customer fairly”?

With new legislation, it will be vital to do affordability within collections and recoveries, and therefore our systems need to be aligned (but more on that in Part 3).

Is the current Debt Review process in South Africa aligned to TCF?

This is going to be a controversial topic, but let’s look at it with an open mind.

The current debt review process has been marred with controversy and unsatisfied customers. According to the National Credit Regulator’s latest annual report, there are currently 1 495 registered debt counsellors, of which 705 were found to be noncompliant.

Based on that data - within an industry created to assist overindebted customers, almost 50% of that industry are noncompliant to governing regulations!

When we look at the people the industry has been created to assist, we will regularly see articles of customer complaints and dissatisfaction - you only need to type in “debt review” into HelloPeter to find examples here.

It is therefore obvious that the current Debt Review process has its flaws, and if we need to measure it against treating customers fairly, it will in all likelihood fail.

Finding a solution

In my opinion the biggest issues within the current process are:

  • Specialisation: Debt Counsellors only need to do a short course to receive a Debt Counselling Certificate (I have also done the course and received the certificate), which empowers them to give specialised financial advice and restructuring power over credit agreements. By making it easy to earn a qualification to give financial advice, often opens the door for irregularity.
  • This industry remains a business, and as such, the aim remains to make a profit. This is in my view the root cause of most of the issues of the Debt Review process.

But what is the alternative?

The process of rearranging credit obligations in order for over indebted customers to manage responsibilities (personal and financial) remains extremely important, now more than ever before.

UK Debt Review structure

The UK debt review structure could be the answer wherein non-profit organisations or organisations which provide a service without financial gain objectives assist with the issue at hand.

  1. The second we introduce companies, which have not been created with profit in mind, we can truly provide a service for the overindebted to assist them. The focus will now not be on profit, but customer outcome based.

Companies such as StepChange, Citizens Advice and Debt Advice Foundation are all non-profit UK based organisations, which rely on industry funding rather than customer based funding.

I therefore believe that if we create non-profit organisations, which are funded by the credit industry, both consumers and credit providers will ultimately reap the benefits.

Let me know your thoughts on this topic by commenting below... 

In part three of this series we will cover flexibility of systems and processes.



Perry de Jager
Perry de Jager
Perry has been involved in Collections and Recoveries for the past 12 years, spending time in different market segments ranging from law firms to investment companies. At Principa, Perry has worked on extended projects within both South Africa and the Middle East with some of the largest financial organisation, providing on-site consulting within the collections and recoveries space covering strategy, process, people and technology.

Latest Posts

The 7 types of credit risk in SME lending

  It is common knowledge in the industry that the credit risk assessment of a consumer applying for credit is far less complex than that of a business that is applying for credit. Why is this the case? Simply put, consumers are usually very similar in their requirements and risks (homogenous) whilst businesses have far more varying risk elements (heterogenous). In this blog we will look at all the different risk elements within a business (here SME) credit application. These are: Risk of proprietors Risk of business Reason for loan Financial ratios Size of loan Risk industry Risk of region Before we delve into this list, it is worth noting that all of these factors need to be deployable as assessment tools within your originations system so it is key that you ensure your system can manage them. If you are on the look out for a loans origination system, then look no further than Principa’s AppSmart. If you are looking for a decision engine to manage your scorecards, policy rules and terms of business then take a look at our DecisionSmart business rules engine. AppSmart and DecisionSmart are part of Principa’s FinSmart Universe allowing for effective credit management across the customer life-cycle.  The different risk elements within a business credit application 1) Risk of proprietors For smaller organisations the risk of the business is inextricably linked to the financial well-being of the proprietors. How small is small? The rule of thumb is companies with up to two to three proprietors should have their proprietors assessed for risk too. This fits in with the SME segment. What data should be looked at? Generally in countries with mature credit bureaux, credit data is looked at including the score (there is normally a score cut-off) and then negative information such as the existence of judgements or defaults; these are typically used within policy rules. Those businesses with proprietors with excessive numbers of “negatives” may be disqualified from the loan application. Some credit bureaux offer a score of an individual based on the performance of all the businesses with which they are associated. This can also be useful in the credit risk assessment process. Another innovation being adopted internationally is the use of psychometrics in credit evaluation of the proprietors. To find out more about adopting credit scoring, read our blog on how to adopt credit scoring.   2) Risk of business The risk of the business should be managed through both scores and policy rules. Lenders will look at information such as the age of company, the experience of directors and the size of company etc. within a score. Alternatively, many lenders utilise the business score offered by credit bureaux. These scores are typically not as strong as consumer scores as the underlying data is limited and sometimes problematic. For example, large successful organisations may have judgements registered against their name which, unlike for consumers, is not necessarily a direct indication of the inability to service debt.   3) Reason for loan The reason for a loan is used more widely in business lending as opposed to unsecured consumer lending. Venture capital, working capital, invoice discounting and bridging finance are just some of many types of loan/facilities available and lenders need to equip themselves with the ability to manage each of these customer types whether it is within originations or collections. Prudent lenders venturing into the SME space for the first time often focus on one or two of these loan types and then expand later – as the operational implication for each type of loan is complex. 4) Financial ratios Financial ratios are core to commercial credit risk assessment. The main challenge here is to ensure that reliable financials are available from the customer. Small businesses may not be audited and thus the financials may be less trustworthy.   Financial ratios can be divided into four categories: Profitability Leverage Coverage Liquidity Profitability can be further divided into margin ratios and return ratios. Lenders are frequently interested in gross profit margins; this is normally explicit on the income statement. The EBIDTA margin and operating profit margins are also used as well as return ratios such as return on assets, return on equity and risk-adjusted-returns. Leverage ratios are useful to lenders as they reflect the portion of the business that is financed by debt. Lower leverage ratios indicate stability. Leverage ratios assessed often incorporate debt-to-asset, debt-to-equity and asset-to-equity. Coverage ratios indicate the coverage that income or assets provide for the servicing of debt or interest expenses. The higher the coverage ratio the better it is for the lender. Coverage ratios are worked out considering the loan/facility that is being applied for. Finally, liquidity ratios indicate the ability for a company to convert its assets into cash. There are a variety of ratios used here. The current ratio is simply the ratio of assets to liabilities. The quick ratio is the ability for the business to pay its current debts off with readily available assets. The higher the liquidity ratios the better. Ratios are used both within credit scorecards as well as within policy rules. You can read more about these ratios here. 5) Size of loan When assessing credit risk for a consumer, the risk of the consumer does not normally change with the change of loan amount or facility (subject to the consumer passing affordability criteria). With business loans, loan amounts can range quite dramatically, and the risk of the applicant is normally tied to the loan amount requested. The loan/facility amount will of course change the ratios (mentioned in the last section) which could affect a positive/negative outcome. The outcome of the loan application is usually directly linked to a loan amount and any marked change to this loan amount would change the risk profile of the application.   6) Risk of industry The risk of an industry in which the SME operates can have a strong deterministic relationship with the entity being able to service the debt. Some lenders use this and those who do not normally identify this as a missing element in their risk assessment process. The identification of industry is always important. If you are in manufacturing, but your clients are the mines, then you are perhaps better identified as operating in mining as opposed to manufacturing. Most lenders who assess industry, will periodically rule out certain industries and perhaps also incorporate industry within their scorecard. Others take a more scientific approach. In the graph below the performance of an industry is tracked for two years and then projected over the next 6 months; this is then compared to the country’s GDP. As the industry appears to track above the projected GDP, a positive outlook is given to this applicant and this may affect them favourably in the credit application.                   7) Risk of Region   The last area of assessment is risk of region. Of the seven, this one is used the least. Here businesses,  either on book or on the bureau, are assessed against their geo-code. Each geo-code is clustered, and the projected outlook is given as positive, static or negative. As with industry this can be used within the assessment process as a policy rule or within a scorecard.   Bringing the seven risk categories together in a risk assessment These seven risk assessment categories are all important in the risk assessment process. How you bring it all together is critical. If you would like to discuss your SME evaluation challenges or find out more about what we offer in credit management software (like AppSmart and DecisionSmart), get in touch with us here.

Collections Resilience post COVID-19 - part 2

Principa Decisions (Pty) L

Collections Resilience post COVID-19

Principa Decisions (Pty) L