The Data Analytics Blog

Our news and views relating to Data Analytics, Big Data, Machine Learning, and the world of Credit.

All Posts

Exploring The Debt Relief Bill And Its Potential Impacts

August 21, 2019 at 8:18 AM

We talk to credit expert, Mignon Roodt, about the Debt Relief Bill, what it is and what the potential impact of the bill is.

Q: What is bad debt relief?

The Parliamentary Committee on Trade and Industry was tasked by The National Assembly to introduce changes to the National Credit Act, to provide debt relief to indebted consumers.  The Debt Relief Bill, formerly the National Credit Amendment Bill, is expected to have a significant impact on the lives of thousands of ordinary South Africans as well as the financial services sector, due to the wide-scale debt relief it will provide.

The proposed legislation makes provision for debt intervention for low income, over-indebted consumers.  It also suggests that credit life insurance be mandatory.  It further proposes ongoing and continuous relief for chronically over-indebted South Africans.

The Bill will allow consumers to approach the National Credit Regulator and its Tribunal directly, under the new debt intervention provision, thereby eliminating the need for expensive legal costs that are generally associated with debt review and making debt relief more accessible to consumers. 

Q: Who qualifies for debt relief?

The Bill caters specifically for consumers earning less than R7,500 per month and who owes less than R50,000 in unsecured debt, such as overdrafts, credit cards, store cards or personal loans.  It also caters for disabled persons, people who have been retrenched and women or children who are heads of households.

The Bill relates explicitly to credit agreements, as defined in the National Credit Act, and may not cover all consumer financial obligations.  For example, some households owe significant amounts to municipalities for rates, taxes, electricity and water.  Their obligations are not based on a credit agreement and therefore not included in the debt relief application.

Consumers who qualify for debt relief may make an application to the National Credit Regulator for debt intervention.  If the Regulator is of the view that the applicant requires assistance, a member of the National Consumer Tribunal can restructure the debt, giving consumers up to five years to repay the debt. If this is not possible, qualifying credit agreements will be suspended, in part or in full, for 12-24 months.  If the financial circumstances of the applicant do not improve over the 12 to 24-month period, the Tribunal can declare that all or part of the debt under the qualifying credit agreements be extinguished.

Once a credit agreement has been extinguished, the Credit Bureau must remove any listing related to a successful debt intervention.

All credit agreements longer than six months and up to R50 000, will be protected by the Bill.  This will prevent consumers, who may be going through severe or unexpected changes in circumstances, such as the death of a breadwinner, from falling into a debt trap.  Under the current Credit Act, an applicant for debt review must have an income, but the new Bill will dispense with that requirement.

Q: What will be the impact?

According to the National Credit Regulator’s Credit Bureau Monitor report, as at the end of June 2018, 24.6million people were credit-active, with nearly 40% or more than 9 million people, considered to be over-indebted, i.e. having accounts that are either three or more months in arrears, or who have judgments or adverse listings against them.  This is the over-indebted population that could potentially benefit from debt intervention.

Treasury estimates that the total amount of debt that could fall under debt extinguishment range from R13.2-billion to R20.7-billion.

While the purpose of the Bill is to protect low income and over-indebted consumers, there will undoubtedly be some consumers who will hope to unfairly benefit from the legislation, similar to the introduction of debt counselling.  However, once a consumer has applied for debt relief, the Regulator must report the application to the Credit Bureau, which will inform all other credit providers and may impact a consumer’s ability to obtain credit in future.  In addition, as part of the final order, the Tribunal may also specifically limit an applicant's ability to apply for further credit, for a period of up to 36 months. 

Credit providers are likely to align their originations and collections strategies, identifying and ring-fencing the qualifying population and applying tailored, possibly more conservative treatments, to limit exposure and mitigate the potential impact of debt review. 

Q: What will happen now?

Many parties have expressed concern that the Bill will restrict credit and increase costs for the poorest of the poor, thereby negatively affecting the credit market.  Credit providers will undoubtedly amend credit practices, to take into consideration the potential for debt extinguishment, when lending to low-income consumers.

Some believe that there are sufficient initiatives in place in the credit industry to restructure and address consumer indebtedness, through debt counsellors.  However, debt counsellors generally do not deal with debtors who earn less than R7,500, as they are unable to afford the fees.

The biggest concern is that the Bill empowers the National Consumer Tribunal and the Court to make restructuring orders, which could reduce interest rates, fees and charges for credit agreements to zero, for five years. This introduces additional risks, which financial institutions will have to factor into their credit processes, most likely resulting in an increase in the cost of credit or a restriction in the extent of credit granted to low-income consumers.

A further concern is the likely volume of debt relief applications and whether the Consumer Tribunal and National Credit Regulator will be able to cope with the caseload.  When the National Credit Act and the debt counselling process was first introduced in 2007, the untested system was put through a baptism of fire after the financial crisis ramped up unemployment and put a strain on households, resulting in a significant backlog of debt counselling cases.  In 2016, more than 340,000 debt counselling applications were received.

The Bill was approved by the National Assembly and sent to the National Council of Provinces in September 2018.  The Bill has been passed and signed into law by President Cyril Ramaphosa in August 2019.

Mignon Roodt
Mignon Roodt
Mignon has over 14 years’ experience in the financial services industry, specialising in Credit Risk Management. At Principa, she has worked on various business consulting projects for major credit issuers in South Africa and the Middle East. These projects include development of credit policy frameworks, operational performance reviews and development of credit risk strategies in both the retail and banking industries. She also specialises in the training of clients in best practice risk management techniques. Previously with Standard Chartered Bank (South Africa) as Credit Manager for South Africa, Mignon was responsible for the implementation of credit and risk policies and strategies for account origination, applications processing, on-going account management and collections for personal loans, mortgages, credit cards and current accounts. Prior to this Mignon was one of the initial members of the team that launched 20twenty, the first internet transaction based bank in South Africa, and was primarily responsible for the design and implementation of the account processing, account management and collections strategies. Mignon holds a Bachelor’s degree in Accountancy (B.Acc) from the University of Stellenbosch and an Honours degree in Accounting Sciences (B.Compt) from the University of South Africa. She qualified as a Chartered Accountant in 1996 and is a member of the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants. Mignon is an Associate Professional Property Valuer and a member of the South African Institute of Valuers.

Latest Posts

The 7 types of credit risk in SME lending

  It is common knowledge in the industry that the credit risk assessment of a consumer applying for credit is far less complex than that of a business that is applying for credit. Why is this the case? Simply put, consumers are usually very similar in their requirements and risks (homogenous) whilst businesses have far more varying risk elements (heterogenous). In this blog we will look at all the different risk elements within a business (here SME) credit application. These are: Risk of proprietors Risk of business Reason for loan Financial ratios Size of loan Risk industry Risk of region Before we delve into this list, it is worth noting that all of these factors need to be deployable as assessment tools within your originations system so it is key that you ensure your system can manage them. If you are on the look out for a loans origination system, then look no further than Principa’s AppSmart. If you are looking for a decision engine to manage your scorecards, policy rules and terms of business then take a look at our DecisionSmart business rules engine. AppSmart and DecisionSmart are part of Principa’s FinSmart Universe allowing for effective credit management across the customer life-cycle.  The different risk elements within a business credit application 1) Risk of proprietors For smaller organisations the risk of the business is inextricably linked to the financial well-being of the proprietors. How small is small? The rule of thumb is companies with up to two to three proprietors should have their proprietors assessed for risk too. This fits in with the SME segment. What data should be looked at? Generally in countries with mature credit bureaux, credit data is looked at including the score (there is normally a score cut-off) and then negative information such as the existence of judgements or defaults; these are typically used within policy rules. Those businesses with proprietors with excessive numbers of “negatives” may be disqualified from the loan application. Some credit bureaux offer a score of an individual based on the performance of all the businesses with which they are associated. This can also be useful in the credit risk assessment process. Another innovation being adopted internationally is the use of psychometrics in credit evaluation of the proprietors. To find out more about adopting credit scoring, read our blog on how to adopt credit scoring.   2) Risk of business The risk of the business should be managed through both scores and policy rules. Lenders will look at information such as the age of company, the experience of directors and the size of company etc. within a score. Alternatively, many lenders utilise the business score offered by credit bureaux. These scores are typically not as strong as consumer scores as the underlying data is limited and sometimes problematic. For example, large successful organisations may have judgements registered against their name which, unlike for consumers, is not necessarily a direct indication of the inability to service debt.   3) Reason for loan The reason for a loan is used more widely in business lending as opposed to unsecured consumer lending. Venture capital, working capital, invoice discounting and bridging finance are just some of many types of loan/facilities available and lenders need to equip themselves with the ability to manage each of these customer types whether it is within originations or collections. Prudent lenders venturing into the SME space for the first time often focus on one or two of these loan types and then expand later – as the operational implication for each type of loan is complex. 4) Financial ratios Financial ratios are core to commercial credit risk assessment. The main challenge here is to ensure that reliable financials are available from the customer. Small businesses may not be audited and thus the financials may be less trustworthy.   Financial ratios can be divided into four categories: Profitability Leverage Coverage Liquidity Profitability can be further divided into margin ratios and return ratios. Lenders are frequently interested in gross profit margins; this is normally explicit on the income statement. The EBIDTA margin and operating profit margins are also used as well as return ratios such as return on assets, return on equity and risk-adjusted-returns. Leverage ratios are useful to lenders as they reflect the portion of the business that is financed by debt. Lower leverage ratios indicate stability. Leverage ratios assessed often incorporate debt-to-asset, debt-to-equity and asset-to-equity. Coverage ratios indicate the coverage that income or assets provide for the servicing of debt or interest expenses. The higher the coverage ratio the better it is for the lender. Coverage ratios are worked out considering the loan/facility that is being applied for. Finally, liquidity ratios indicate the ability for a company to convert its assets into cash. There are a variety of ratios used here. The current ratio is simply the ratio of assets to liabilities. The quick ratio is the ability for the business to pay its current debts off with readily available assets. The higher the liquidity ratios the better. Ratios are used both within credit scorecards as well as within policy rules. You can read more about these ratios here. 5) Size of loan When assessing credit risk for a consumer, the risk of the consumer does not normally change with the change of loan amount or facility (subject to the consumer passing affordability criteria). With business loans, loan amounts can range quite dramatically, and the risk of the applicant is normally tied to the loan amount requested. The loan/facility amount will of course change the ratios (mentioned in the last section) which could affect a positive/negative outcome. The outcome of the loan application is usually directly linked to a loan amount and any marked change to this loan amount would change the risk profile of the application.   6) Risk of industry The risk of an industry in which the SME operates can have a strong deterministic relationship with the entity being able to service the debt. Some lenders use this and those who do not normally identify this as a missing element in their risk assessment process. The identification of industry is always important. If you are in manufacturing, but your clients are the mines, then you are perhaps better identified as operating in mining as opposed to manufacturing. Most lenders who assess industry, will periodically rule out certain industries and perhaps also incorporate industry within their scorecard. Others take a more scientific approach. In the graph below the performance of an industry is tracked for two years and then projected over the next 6 months; this is then compared to the country’s GDP. As the industry appears to track above the projected GDP, a positive outlook is given to this applicant and this may affect them favourably in the credit application.                   7) Risk of Region   The last area of assessment is risk of region. Of the seven, this one is used the least. Here businesses,  either on book or on the bureau, are assessed against their geo-code. Each geo-code is clustered, and the projected outlook is given as positive, static or negative. As with industry this can be used within the assessment process as a policy rule or within a scorecard.   Bringing the seven risk categories together in a risk assessment These seven risk assessment categories are all important in the risk assessment process. How you bring it all together is critical. If you would like to discuss your SME evaluation challenges or find out more about what we offer in credit management software (like AppSmart and DecisionSmart), get in touch with us here.

Collections Resilience post COVID-19 - part 2

Principa Decisions (Pty) L

Collections Resilience post COVID-19

Principa Decisions (Pty) L