The Data Analytics Blog

Our news and views relating to Data Analytics, Big Data, Machine Learning, and the world of Credit.

All Posts

Finovate Spring 2017: Highlights From Day 1

April 27, 2017 at 9:58 AM

We at Principa decided to attend Finovate Spring again this year (we were here 2 years ago) to learn about new trends, network with like-minded companies and to look for potential partnerships. In this post, I cover some of the highlights and more interesting topics from Day 1 of the industry's most exciting gathering of innovators in the fintech world.

Our 3 sources of input for innovation

principa-sources-of-innovation.png

As we invest tens of thousands of hours every year to develop our analytics and tech products, we need to ensure that we take input from the three principal sources of innovative ideas as we develop our innovation road-maps. We are fully aware that the development paths are in a large way determined by our collective imaginations and client demands.

The one input that we are determined not to ignore is for us to stay in contact with global trends. Finovate provides an ideal platform for us to look for partnerships, new synergies and to best understand what new developments are topical across different industries and in different geographies. At Finovate you get to listen to nearly 60 companies talk about their products and why they are doing what they are doing. Thereafter you are given ample time to network with these companies and explore more.

Whereas the themes covered at Finovate cover a wide-range of tools across a variety of industries - all under the umbrella of “financial sector” - the main industries covered are the following:

  • Lending
  • Insurance
  • Customer Services
  • Investing
  • Security / Fraud
  • Data / Analytics
  • Training

In this post we explore some of the key highlights of day 1 from the conference.

Highlights: Day 1

We were exposed to wide variety of businesses on day 1 at Finovate. The majority of companies presenting were North America-based, with a small number from Europe and two from Israel. The two areas we found of most interest were how new technology was being applied to reduce fraud and to reduce paperwork for customers during the application process. 

Reducing fraud

On the lending front, some of the key themes incorporated security and fraud in the originations space. Innovation here has been driven by both legislation and risk mitigation requirements. While South African lenders have been battling Proof of Income (POI) compliance matters over the past 2 years, European lenders have been introducing video verification steps for digital applications to meet some of their compliance requirements. Expect South Africa to start adopting this soon either through another wave of compliance or simply as necessity to support omni-channel capabilities.

Companies such as Jumio, Lleida.net with their Topayz product and Synapsefi all have products with video verification capability. Features of this include two elements:

  1. The first is the customer recording a video of themselves stating “I, John Doe, would like a $10,000 loan. This step confirms that the application matches the customer’s true desire. A fraudster could change the audio recorded on the video. The likes of Synapsefi incorporate lip-reading algorithm to ensure what was said matches the customer’s lips (another fraud mitigation feature).
  2. The second element is using facial recognition software to match a video of an individual to their ID photo. The software is advanced enough to recognise that it is a human rather than a picture of the individual.

Scroll down for the videos of the more notable presentations from Day 1.

Reducing paperwork in applications

As South African lenders battle with the income verification steps and the inevitable drop-off in completion of application (also known as reduction in “starter rate”), similar challenges are being felt elsewhere in other geographies and industries. An example being the very competitive mortgage sector in the US where 20-30 documents per application is common. As an increasing number of applications move over to a digital platform, drop off in applications is a major problem.

Solutions presented this year at Finovate Spring addressing this issue incorporate smart documentation management through the following tools:

  1. Intelligent documentation management
  2. Dynamic customer-conversation platform

1. Intelligent Document Management

Intelligent documentation management is nothing new, what has changed is that it appears to have got smarter. Through optical character recognition (OCR) technology (which, incidentally, is over 100 years old!) and machine learning, the systems demonstrated were not only able to scrape data from scanned documents, but to classify all data and do key comparisons and flagging discrepancies.

Key Intelligent Document Management companies featured were: 

  • HotDocs who also have nifty documentation building templates that can be deployed rapidly;
  • Capsilon who focus on working through large amounts of docs and effectively converting unstructured documentation data into structured data – the US government use them too;
  • Microblink who through their mobile apps have some very impressive and swift data receipt and ID capturing tools.

2.Dynamic Customer-Conversation platform

The second digital application support tool that was demoed was a dynamic customer-conversation platform. Here call centre staff can step into a customer’s online application through a chat portal to guide the customer through their application. The “chat” portal can toggle from text to voice to video and text and docs can be exchanged, guided browsing toggled and meetings scheduled etc.

Layer presented an impressive conversational platform. SaleMove believe that intuitive customer service is essential with their Omnibrowse platform and that “How can I help you,” should now be an obsolete phrase.

Read my blog post on highlights from Day 2 of Finovate here.

Learn more about our Coaching Bot for Call Centre Agents 

Thomas Maydon
Thomas Maydon
Thomas Maydon is the Head of Credit Solutions at Principa. With over 17 years of experience in the Southern African, West African and Middle Eastern retail credit markets, Tom has primarily been involved in consulting, analytics, credit bureau and predictive modelling services. He has experience in all aspects of the credit life cycle (in multiple industries) including intelligent prospecting, originations, strategy simulation, affordability analysis, behavioural modelling, pricing analysis, collections processes, and provisions (including Basel II) and profitability calculations.

Latest Posts

The 7 types of credit risk in SME lending

  It is common knowledge in the industry that the credit risk assessment of a consumer applying for credit is far less complex than that of a business that is applying for credit. Why is this the case? Simply put, consumers are usually very similar in their requirements and risks (homogenous) whilst businesses have far more varying risk elements (heterogenous). In this blog we will look at all the different risk elements within a business (here SME) credit application. These are: Risk of proprietors Risk of business Reason for loan Financial ratios Size of loan Risk industry Risk of region Before we delve into this list, it is worth noting that all of these factors need to be deployable as assessment tools within your originations system so it is key that you ensure your system can manage them. If you are on the look out for a loans origination system, then look no further than Principa’s AppSmart. If you are looking for a decision engine to manage your scorecards, policy rules and terms of business then take a look at our DecisionSmart business rules engine. AppSmart and DecisionSmart are part of Principa’s FinSmart Universe allowing for effective credit management across the customer life-cycle.  The different risk elements within a business credit application 1) Risk of proprietors For smaller organisations the risk of the business is inextricably linked to the financial well-being of the proprietors. How small is small? The rule of thumb is companies with up to two to three proprietors should have their proprietors assessed for risk too. This fits in with the SME segment. What data should be looked at? Generally in countries with mature credit bureaux, credit data is looked at including the score (there is normally a score cut-off) and then negative information such as the existence of judgements or defaults; these are typically used within policy rules. Those businesses with proprietors with excessive numbers of “negatives” may be disqualified from the loan application. Some credit bureaux offer a score of an individual based on the performance of all the businesses with which they are associated. This can also be useful in the credit risk assessment process. Another innovation being adopted internationally is the use of psychometrics in credit evaluation of the proprietors. To find out more about adopting credit scoring, read our blog on how to adopt credit scoring.   2) Risk of business The risk of the business should be managed through both scores and policy rules. Lenders will look at information such as the age of company, the experience of directors and the size of company etc. within a score. Alternatively, many lenders utilise the business score offered by credit bureaux. These scores are typically not as strong as consumer scores as the underlying data is limited and sometimes problematic. For example, large successful organisations may have judgements registered against their name which, unlike for consumers, is not necessarily a direct indication of the inability to service debt.   3) Reason for loan The reason for a loan is used more widely in business lending as opposed to unsecured consumer lending. Venture capital, working capital, invoice discounting and bridging finance are just some of many types of loan/facilities available and lenders need to equip themselves with the ability to manage each of these customer types whether it is within originations or collections. Prudent lenders venturing into the SME space for the first time often focus on one or two of these loan types and then expand later – as the operational implication for each type of loan is complex. 4) Financial ratios Financial ratios are core to commercial credit risk assessment. The main challenge here is to ensure that reliable financials are available from the customer. Small businesses may not be audited and thus the financials may be less trustworthy.   Financial ratios can be divided into four categories: Profitability Leverage Coverage Liquidity Profitability can be further divided into margin ratios and return ratios. Lenders are frequently interested in gross profit margins; this is normally explicit on the income statement. The EBIDTA margin and operating profit margins are also used as well as return ratios such as return on assets, return on equity and risk-adjusted-returns. Leverage ratios are useful to lenders as they reflect the portion of the business that is financed by debt. Lower leverage ratios indicate stability. Leverage ratios assessed often incorporate debt-to-asset, debt-to-equity and asset-to-equity. Coverage ratios indicate the coverage that income or assets provide for the servicing of debt or interest expenses. The higher the coverage ratio the better it is for the lender. Coverage ratios are worked out considering the loan/facility that is being applied for. Finally, liquidity ratios indicate the ability for a company to convert its assets into cash. There are a variety of ratios used here. The current ratio is simply the ratio of assets to liabilities. The quick ratio is the ability for the business to pay its current debts off with readily available assets. The higher the liquidity ratios the better. Ratios are used both within credit scorecards as well as within policy rules. You can read more about these ratios here. 5) Size of loan When assessing credit risk for a consumer, the risk of the consumer does not normally change with the change of loan amount or facility (subject to the consumer passing affordability criteria). With business loans, loan amounts can range quite dramatically, and the risk of the applicant is normally tied to the loan amount requested. The loan/facility amount will of course change the ratios (mentioned in the last section) which could affect a positive/negative outcome. The outcome of the loan application is usually directly linked to a loan amount and any marked change to this loan amount would change the risk profile of the application.   6) Risk of industry The risk of an industry in which the SME operates can have a strong deterministic relationship with the entity being able to service the debt. Some lenders use this and those who do not normally identify this as a missing element in their risk assessment process. The identification of industry is always important. If you are in manufacturing, but your clients are the mines, then you are perhaps better identified as operating in mining as opposed to manufacturing. Most lenders who assess industry, will periodically rule out certain industries and perhaps also incorporate industry within their scorecard. Others take a more scientific approach. In the graph below the performance of an industry is tracked for two years and then projected over the next 6 months; this is then compared to the country’s GDP. As the industry appears to track above the projected GDP, a positive outlook is given to this applicant and this may affect them favourably in the credit application.                   7) Risk of Region   The last area of assessment is risk of region. Of the seven, this one is used the least. Here businesses,  either on book or on the bureau, are assessed against their geo-code. Each geo-code is clustered, and the projected outlook is given as positive, static or negative. As with industry this can be used within the assessment process as a policy rule or within a scorecard.   Bringing the seven risk categories together in a risk assessment These seven risk assessment categories are all important in the risk assessment process. How you bring it all together is critical. If you would like to discuss your SME evaluation challenges or find out more about what we offer in credit management software (like AppSmart and DecisionSmart), get in touch with us here.

Collections Resilience post COVID-19 - part 2

Principa Decisions (Pty) L

Collections Resilience post COVID-19

Principa Decisions (Pty) L