The Data Analytics Blog

Our news and views relating to Data Analytics, Big Data, Machine Learning, and the world of Credit.

All Posts

How To Cure A Debt Recovery Hangover From Holiday Spending

January 8, 2016 at 1:31 PM

How to Cure a Debt Recovery Hangover from Holiday Spending text and hands extending offering several medical remedy options

Traditionally, the first quarter of any calendar year sees a dilution of both collection and recovery yields given the overspend that occurs over the December holiday season. Therefore, optimal strategies and operational execution are key to mitigating the effects of the first quarter ‘hangover’.

And this festive season is expected to have its traditional impact on consumer debt levels. South Africa finds itself in tight economic circumstances and this is aptly illustrated by:

  • Domestic debt-to-income ratio stands at approximately 78%,
  • Consumer credit extension in SA equates to R 1.8 trillion, with roughly 9% of this debt three months or more in arrears, and
  • Approximately 45% of the 22.5 million credit active consumers have impaired credit records.

On top of this, credit providers are having to deal with a recent wave of regulatory change which makes it increasingly difficult to optimise delinquent account management, in particular where the debt is unsecured and the client has multiple exposures to various credit providers.

As with any hangover, there is no silver bullet to curing the post-holiday collections headache. However, in order to achieve superior yields, credit providers need to ensure synergy between a number of key, distinct collection and recovery disciplines that extend across strategy, people, process and technology. In the end, the best remedy is doing the “basics brilliantly.”

Doing Basics Brilliantly


1. Prevention

An ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure. It is always better to focus on limiting the propensity of current clients rolling into a delinquent state. The key to doing this successfully is by segmenting your debtors by how likely they are to pay or roll into a delinquent state the next month, and then treating each segment accordingly. Remember, these clients have not defaulted – the point is to reach them with the relevant treatment before they do. 

The easiest approach is to develop a propensity-to-roll scorecard, which is derived from a combination of internal (payment, account maturity, etc.) data and external (bureau) data which divides your current portfolio into distinct high, medium and low propensity to roll categories.

Next, prioritise your high-propensity-to-roll population segment using a suitable treatment framework (call, SMS or other) and remind them of the importance of maintaining their current credit standing. The primary treatment here would be educational.

2. Prediction

‘Knowledge’ as they say ‘is power’. Superior credit providers and debt collectors should be able to segment their delinquent accountholders into clear categories that relate to their ability to pay. This ability to understand and predict who is most likely to fail to meet their obligations in the short term is underwritten by analytically derived propensity-to-roll scorecards.

As per the preventative steps above, these perspectives are sourced from a combination of internal and external data; the latter primarily derived from credit bureau information. Whilst there are other data sources that might point to a propensity to roll (or cure), such as social media or mobile data, their veracity has yet to be proven.

Segmenting a portfolio into discrete risk segments allows for optimising workforce management, campaign prioritisation, and suitable treatment frameworks to address the real (and perceived) risk and aligning effort (and, by implication, cost) to an acceptable collection or recovery outcome.

3. Policy

Another effective way of improving collection rates is by creating a holistic policy framework that gives both the credit provider and debtor sensible, workable opportunities to regularise and/or exit the delinquent debt on a ‘win-win’ basis.

There is an old adage in credit that states: ‘’your first loss is often your best loss’’ and forward roll-rate statistics seem to confirm that unless an exposure is contained within 60 days of becoming delinquent, there is a high probability that the account will eventually roll into a state of write-off.

Part of the lost opportunity here is that some credit providers have not considered when to rehabilitate, when to seek repayment and ultimately, when to institute recovery proceedings in a logical, sequentially driven policy framework. ‘Doing the same thing and expecting different results’ is a well-known definition of insanity, yet how many debtors receive different tilted collection and recovery treatments as they progress along the delinquent credit lifecycle? By tilted, we mean the (1) type of collection action (2) the tone of collection action, and ultimately (3) the timing of the collection or recovery action.

Therefore, the key to an optimal policy framework is articulating the following three treatment frameworks:

  1. When to rehabilitate (and what to offer to the debtor to support the philosophy),
  2. When to seek a mutually beneficial (and commercially astute) exit by way of compromise/settlement, and finally,
  3. When to consider commercially sound debt recovery proceedings.

Underpinning all of this are the credit provider brand values, the regulatory environment, and ultimately, the defined reputation risk framework within which a credit provider wishes to navigate.

4. Prioritisation

Having identified who may or may not pay you, and articulated a policy framework that allows the credit provider to apply differentiated, tilted treatments to specific risk segments, the next ‘basic that needs to be executed brilliantly’ is how to operationally deploy this strategy to ensure adequate portfolio penetration and activation rates.

This component is arguably the most challenging to execute and is probably one of the prime drivers for misalignment between risk and operations. Given that there are so many moving parts - capacity management (now more frequently referred to as workforce management), contactability, agent productivity, and dialler optimisation to name but a few - this execution component requires a carefully considered approach to maximise portfolio yields.

In this space, one needs clearly articulated collection and recovery calendars that specify:

  1. what campaigns are run and when they are retired,
  2. what treatments are executed (sometimes in parallel),
  3. the optimum time to call,
  4. when to retire accounts from the dialler campaigns and escalate trace activities,
  5. a good combination of predictive and preview dialler campaigns,
  6. alignment between capacity and likelihood of debtor engagement (you don’t want redundant agents and idle dialler time) and ultimately,
  7. the capability of monitoring productivity and granular dialler campaign outcomes to ensure appropriate mitigation of risk inherent in the portfolio.

There are a number of software models that can facilitate and enhance this process by calculating the required productivity and performance outcomes to support given collection targets. These models, extract salient operational data to provide insights and validate real-time decision-making.

5. Pathology

Finally, if one considers the extent of actual collection and recovery activities and outcomes that occur in a real-time environment for a mid- to large-scale credit provider, then it is a business critical requirement to have superior insights at a strategic, financial and tactical level.

This business intelligence is drawn from a variety of platforms (host, dialler and collection/recovery systems) and should be able to tell a compelling story in terms of the following key metrics (not exhaustive):

  • Portfolio yields and collection/recovery rates per propensity-to-roll or pay segment,
  • Transition matrices to track movement of delinquent balances,
  • Granular campaign outcomes - the relationship between attempts/connects/right parties and promise-to-pay outcomes,
  • Granular campaign penetration - extent of accounts worked and activation (payment) rates,
  • Productivity and capacity management by way of operational insights in terms of accounts worked/not paid; accounts worked/paid; accounts not worked/not paid and accounts not worked/paid, 
  • Underlying costs to collect and recover,
  • NAEDO/AEDO tracking and outcomes, and
  • Compromise/settlement performance.

There are many other important metrics, but broadly speaking, if there is adequate coverage in terms of the above, then there should be good understanding of ‘cause’ and ‘effect’.

Getting through the over-indulgence of holiday shopping with minimal headaches

In summary, the ability to optimise collection and recovery outcomes rests on a number of key pillars which are synthesised by these five themes:


This is not to say that other components – such as performance management, practitioner management, and regulatory management - are not fundamental to the success of any credit provider navigating the increasingly precarious South African debt enforcement process. However, get these disciplines right, and you are well on your way to getting through the “over-indulgence” that comes with the holiday shopping season with reduced collection and recovery headaches. 

If you believe that the best remedy is doing the “basics brilliantly,” read more on our Collections Solutions

Increase your collection and recovery yields

Perry de Jager
Perry de Jager
Perry has been involved in Collections and Recoveries for the past 12 years, spending time in different market segments ranging from law firms to investment companies. At Principa, Perry has worked on extended projects within both South Africa and the Middle East with some of the largest financial organisation, providing on-site consulting within the collections and recoveries space covering strategy, process, people and technology.

Latest Posts

The 7 types of credit risk in SME lending

  It is common knowledge in the industry that the credit risk assessment of a consumer applying for credit is far less complex than that of a business that is applying for credit. Why is this the case? Simply put, consumers are usually very similar in their requirements and risks (homogenous) whilst businesses have far more varying risk elements (heterogenous). In this blog we will look at all the different risk elements within a business (here SME) credit application. These are: Risk of proprietors Risk of business Reason for loan Financial ratios Size of loan Risk industry Risk of region Before we delve into this list, it is worth noting that all of these factors need to be deployable as assessment tools within your originations system so it is key that you ensure your system can manage them. If you are on the look out for a loans origination system, then look no further than Principa’s AppSmart. If you are looking for a decision engine to manage your scorecards, policy rules and terms of business then take a look at our DecisionSmart business rules engine. AppSmart and DecisionSmart are part of Principa’s FinSmart Universe allowing for effective credit management across the customer life-cycle.   The different risk elements within a business credit application 1) Risk of proprietors For smaller organisations the risk of the business is inextricably linked to the financial well-being of the proprietors. How small is small? The rule of thumb is companies with up to two to three proprietors should have their proprietors assessed for risk too. This fits in with the SME segment. What data should be looked at? Generally in countries with mature credit bureaux, credit data is looked at including the score (there is normally a score cut-off) and then negative information such as the existence of judgements or defaults; these are typically used within policy rules. Those businesses with proprietors with excessive numbers of “negatives” may be disqualified from the loan application. Some credit bureaux offer a score of an individual based on the performance of all the businesses with which they are associated. This can also be useful in the credit risk assessment process. Another innovation being adopted internationally is the use of psychometrics in credit evaluation of the proprietors. To find out more about adopting credit scoring, read our blog on how to adopt credit scoring.   2) Risk of business The risk of the business should be managed through both scores and policy rules. Lenders will look at information such as the age of company, the experience of directors and the size of company etc. within a score. Alternatively, many lenders utilise the business score offered by credit bureaux. These scores are typically not as strong as consumer scores as the underlying data is limited and sometimes problematic. For example, large successful organisations may have judgements registered against their name which, unlike for consumers, is not necessarily a direct indication of the inability to service debt.   3) Reason for loan The reason for a loan is used more widely in business lending as opposed to unsecured consumer lending. Venture capital, working capital, invoice discounting and bridging finance are just some of many types of loan/facilities available and lenders need to equip themselves with the ability to manage each of these customer types whether it is within originations or collections. Prudent lenders venturing into the SME space for the first time often focus on one or two of these loan types and then expand later – as the operational implication for each type of loan is complex.   4) Financial ratios Financial ratios are core to commercial credit risk assessment. The main challenge here is to ensure that reliable financials are available from the customer. Small businesses may not be audited and thus the financials may be less trustworthy. Financial ratios can be divided into four categories: Profitability Leverage Coverage Liquidity Profitability can be further divided into margin ratios and return ratios. Lenders are frequently interested in gross profit margins; this is normally explicit on the income statement. The EBIDTA margin and operating profit margins are also used as well as return ratios such as return on assets, return on equity and risk-adjusted-returns. Leverage ratios are useful to lenders as they reflect the portion of the business that is financed by debt. Lower leverage ratios indicate stability. Leverage ratios assessed often incorporate debt-to-asset, debt-to-equity and asset-to-equity. Coverage ratios indicate the coverage that income or assets provide for the servicing of debt or interest expenses. The higher the coverage ratio the better it is for the lender. Coverage ratios are worked out considering the loan/facility that is being applied for. Finally, liquidity ratios indicate the ability for a company to convert its assets into cash. There are a variety of ratios used here. The current ratio is simply the ratio of assets to liabilities. The quick ratio is the ability for the business to pay its current debts off with readily available assets. The higher the liquidity ratios the better. Ratios are used both within credit scorecards as well as within policy rules. You can read more about these ratios here.   5) Size of loan When assessing credit risk for a consumer, the risk of the consumer does not normally change with the change of loan amount or facility (subject to the consumer passing affordability criteria). With business loans, loan amounts can range quite dramatically, and the risk of the applicant is normally tied to the loan amount requested. The loan/facility amount will of course change the ratios (mentioned in the last section) which could affect a positive/negative outcome. The outcome of the loan application is usually directly linked to a loan amount and any marked change to this loan amount would change the risk profile of the application.   6) Risk of industry The risk of an industry in which the SME operates can have a strong deterministic relationship with the entity being able to service the debt. Some lenders use this and those who do not normally identify this as a missing element in their risk assessment process. The identification of industry is always important. If you are in manufacturing, but your clients are the mines, then you are perhaps better identified as operating in mining as opposed to manufacturing. Most lenders who assess industry, will periodically rule out certain industries and perhaps also incorporate industry within their scorecard. Others take a more scientific approach. In the graph below the performance of an industry is tracked for two years and then projected over the next 6 months; this is then compared to the country’s GDP. As the industry appears to track above the projected GDP, a positive outlook is given to this applicant and this may affect them favourably in the credit application.                   7) Risk of Region   The last area of assessment is risk of region. Of the seven, this one is used the least. Here businesses,  either on book or on the bureau, are assessed against their geo-code. Each geo-code is clustered, and the projected outlook is given as positive, static or negative. As with industry this can be used within the assessment process as a policy rule or within a scorecard.   Bringing the seven risk categories together in a risk assessment These seven risk assessment categories are all important in the risk assessment process. How you bring it all together is critical. If you would like to discuss your SME evaluation challenges or find out more about what we offer in credit management software (like AppSmart and DecisionSmart), get in touch with us here.

Collections Resilience post COVID-19 - part 2

Principa Decisions (Pty) L

Collections Resilience post COVID-19

Principa Decisions (Pty) L