The Data Analytics Blog

Our news and views relating to Data Analytics, Big Data, Machine Learning, and the world of Credit.

All Posts

Incorporating Credit Lifecycle Predictive Outcomes In Your Collections And Recoveries Call Centre

January 16, 2019 at 10:07 AM

In a collections environment, an agent needs to follow up with numerous customers on their outstanding credit and the more distinct information the agent has on each customer, the better the agent will understand who they are interacting with and what the opportunities, risks and expectation of the collections call with the client are.

We’ve identified four models, where the outputs could assist collections agents in reducing bad debt, improving collections and reducing needless follow-up.

Models to use in your collections call centre

Propensity to pay (PTP) model, given right party contact (RPC)

A PTP model, given RPC, allows an agent to understand the likelihood of a customer making a payment when the number they have dialled reaches the correct person. By recognising how likely a customer is to make a payment, an agent can decide on how to treat the customer. For example, if a customer has a high propensity to pay, the agent may feel a quick reminder is enough to ensure a payment. However, if a customer has a low propensity to pay, the agent may want to spend more time explaining the repercussions of non-payment; discuss ways of how to make a payment; etc. to better ensure a payment is made. Similarly, if a client has a high propensity to pay but during the call with the client, the client is hesitant to commit to a promise to pay this insight could inform the agent to invest a little more time and effort to attain a promise to pay due to the higher likelihood that the time is well spent and would lead to a promise.

Propensity to default (PTD) model, given a promise to pay

A PTD model, given a promise to pay, allows an agent to understand the likelihood of a customer breaking their promise to pay. By having this information on hand, the agent can adjust their conversation with the customer accordingly. For example, if a customer has a low propensity to default, the agent may feel a quick confirmation of the promise to pay is enough to ensure the promise is kept. However, if a customer has a high propensity to default, the agent may want to spend more time explaining the repercussions of non-payment; confirm the source of payment, ensure the level and timing of the promise aligns to the customer income and discuss ways of how to make a payment to better ensure that the promise is sincere and that the promise is kept.

Preferred installment model

A preferred installment model aims to predict the largest amount a customer is likely able to pay. This amount could be used by an agent to better negotiate the promise to pay value. For example, suppose the preferred instalment amount is R200. If the client promises to pay R100, the agent could try to persuade the client to pay more, knowing the client can likely afford to increase the payment amount. However, if the client promises to pay R300, it is possible the client cannot afford to make the payment therefore increasing the likelihood of breaking the promise to pay. Given this, the agent could suggest to the client that he rather commits to a lower payment and if the opportunity exists, to make further payments later on.

Settlement amount model

A settlement amount model gives an agent the best account level settlement offer that should be negotiated with a client to maximise the lifetime collection return of the portfolio.  The account level settlement offer is analytically defined by evaluating each client’s expected lifetime recoveries to ensure that expected payments from expected paying customers are retained while increasing payments from expected non-paying clients.

Account level settlement strategies mitigates the risk of offering the client a settlement discount and losing out on the present value of lifetime expected cash-flows / payment. For example, taking an immediate hit on the impairment, being bespoke to the customer needs, introducing tiered offers for negotiation and considering the behaviour of expected paying accounts only.

Having the account level settlement offers displayed to the collections agent makes the option and negotiation of a settlement offer top of mind.

Model methodology

The first two models use a very similar methodology to predict a likelihood of payment following an RPC or a likelihood of default on a promise to pay. The typical definition and outcome period of a payment is R50 in the month following RPC while that of a default is as per the broken promise flag in the collections system. The models will use past behaviour and trends to predict future behaviour. Therefore, an extensive list of features based on historical data will be created to use in the model development. Once all of the above has been established, predictive modelling techniques will be used to model the outcome. These models rely on there being sufficient historical behavioural data for modelling and feature creation.

The preferred instalment model will predict the probability of default for a range of promise to pay values. The typical outcome period of this payment is in line with the promise to pay due date while that of a default is as per the broken promise flag in the collections system. After creating an extensive list of features based on historical data, action-effect modelling will be used to determine the probability of default with each promise to pay amount. From this, either the maximum expected value for each account holder can be calculated (i.e. expected payment value, given the probability of default), and/or a maximum default threshold can be applied (i.e. no values above a certain default level will be considered).

The preferred instalment model relies on there being sufficient data in terms of the range of promise to pay values with some account-holders breaking their promise to pay while others keeping their promise to pay.

The settlement offer model will predict the expected discounted lifetime recoveries over current outstanding balance for each account. The predictive model will use a combination of short term and long term past behaviour and looks to predict future payment behaviour. Short term data is important to ensure that the models remain accurate to the most recent recovery strategies and performance and long term data indicates the longer term shape of payments. Statistical/empirical modelling techniques will be applied to predict the payment over balance ratio in the short term and then these will be aligned through scorecard alignment processes to a lifetime discounted payment expectation for each account.

The modelled lifetime recoveries rates will then be statistically adjusted to determine a maximum settlement offer percentage that will ensure that the current expected payment levels from paying customers are retained while increasing payments from expected non-paying clients, i.e.:

  • If all customers that are expected to make at least one payment (regardless of a settlement offer) take the maximum settlement offer the net present value of the total payments of the settlement campaign and that of expected payments of the lifetime of the account will be the same.
  • For every non-paying client taking up a settlement offer, the payments received equals a benefit to your organisation.

The modelled settlement offer percentage for each account and a tiered settlement offer strategy, allowing for different levels of negotiation and multiple payment options, will then be implemented and modelled percentages will be converted into 3 tiered Rand value discount offers for each account.

Data required for these models

The data requirements for each of these models are largely similar. The following historic data will be required:

  • Account performance data, payment information; account age; delinquency; amount outstanding; etc.
  • Account-holder data, including account-holder demographics (e.g. age, gender, etc.)
  • Bureau data for SACRRA members

To develop a PTP model, given RPC it is additionally required to have historic data for:

  • RPC flag with date stamp

To develop a PTD model, given a promise to pay and the preferred instalment amount model it is additionally required to have historic data for:

  • Promise to pay level data over time with account link, including amount, terms and break or kept indicator

Information displayed to your agents

It is vitally important, however, that you call centre agents have easy-access to the outcomes and recommendations made by these models.

With models built by Principa in our proprietary decisioning software, DecisionSmart, Principa’s Agent X Call Centre Virtual Assistant can deliver real-time call and account specific data, decisions and information to your agents visually, to inform, guide and motivate them.

Read more on Agent X or request a demo.

Contact Us to Discuss Your data analytics Business Requirements

Megan Wilks
Megan Wilks
Megan Wilks is a consultant within the Decision Analytics team at Principa. Prior to joining in 2016, she worked in the consulting and data analytics field, covering a range of industries, including retail, credit and non-profit in Southern and East Africa.

Latest Posts

The 7 types of credit risk in SME lending

  It is common knowledge in the industry that the credit risk assessment of a consumer applying for credit is far less complex than that of a business that is applying for credit. Why is this the case? Simply put, consumers are usually very similar in their requirements and risks (homogenous) whilst businesses have far more varying risk elements (heterogenous). In this blog we will look at all the different risk elements within a business (here SME) credit application. These are: Risk of proprietors Risk of business Reason for loan Financial ratios Size of loan Risk industry Risk of region Before we delve into this list, it is worth noting that all of these factors need to be deployable as assessment tools within your originations system so it is key that you ensure your system can manage them. If you are on the look out for a loans origination system, then look no further than Principa’s AppSmart. If you are looking for a decision engine to manage your scorecards, policy rules and terms of business then take a look at our DecisionSmart business rules engine. AppSmart and DecisionSmart are part of Principa’s FinSmart Universe allowing for effective credit management across the customer life-cycle.  The different risk elements within a business credit application 1) Risk of proprietors For smaller organisations the risk of the business is inextricably linked to the financial well-being of the proprietors. How small is small? The rule of thumb is companies with up to two to three proprietors should have their proprietors assessed for risk too. This fits in with the SME segment. What data should be looked at? Generally in countries with mature credit bureaux, credit data is looked at including the score (there is normally a score cut-off) and then negative information such as the existence of judgements or defaults; these are typically used within policy rules. Those businesses with proprietors with excessive numbers of “negatives” may be disqualified from the loan application. Some credit bureaux offer a score of an individual based on the performance of all the businesses with which they are associated. This can also be useful in the credit risk assessment process. Another innovation being adopted internationally is the use of psychometrics in credit evaluation of the proprietors. To find out more about adopting credit scoring, read our blog on how to adopt credit scoring.   2) Risk of business The risk of the business should be managed through both scores and policy rules. Lenders will look at information such as the age of company, the experience of directors and the size of company etc. within a score. Alternatively, many lenders utilise the business score offered by credit bureaux. These scores are typically not as strong as consumer scores as the underlying data is limited and sometimes problematic. For example, large successful organisations may have judgements registered against their name which, unlike for consumers, is not necessarily a direct indication of the inability to service debt.   3) Reason for loan The reason for a loan is used more widely in business lending as opposed to unsecured consumer lending. Venture capital, working capital, invoice discounting and bridging finance are just some of many types of loan/facilities available and lenders need to equip themselves with the ability to manage each of these customer types whether it is within originations or collections. Prudent lenders venturing into the SME space for the first time often focus on one or two of these loan types and then expand later – as the operational implication for each type of loan is complex. 4) Financial ratios Financial ratios are core to commercial credit risk assessment. The main challenge here is to ensure that reliable financials are available from the customer. Small businesses may not be audited and thus the financials may be less trustworthy.   Financial ratios can be divided into four categories: Profitability Leverage Coverage Liquidity Profitability can be further divided into margin ratios and return ratios. Lenders are frequently interested in gross profit margins; this is normally explicit on the income statement. The EBIDTA margin and operating profit margins are also used as well as return ratios such as return on assets, return on equity and risk-adjusted-returns. Leverage ratios are useful to lenders as they reflect the portion of the business that is financed by debt. Lower leverage ratios indicate stability. Leverage ratios assessed often incorporate debt-to-asset, debt-to-equity and asset-to-equity. Coverage ratios indicate the coverage that income or assets provide for the servicing of debt or interest expenses. The higher the coverage ratio the better it is for the lender. Coverage ratios are worked out considering the loan/facility that is being applied for. Finally, liquidity ratios indicate the ability for a company to convert its assets into cash. There are a variety of ratios used here. The current ratio is simply the ratio of assets to liabilities. The quick ratio is the ability for the business to pay its current debts off with readily available assets. The higher the liquidity ratios the better. Ratios are used both within credit scorecards as well as within policy rules. You can read more about these ratios here. 5) Size of loan When assessing credit risk for a consumer, the risk of the consumer does not normally change with the change of loan amount or facility (subject to the consumer passing affordability criteria). With business loans, loan amounts can range quite dramatically, and the risk of the applicant is normally tied to the loan amount requested. The loan/facility amount will of course change the ratios (mentioned in the last section) which could affect a positive/negative outcome. The outcome of the loan application is usually directly linked to a loan amount and any marked change to this loan amount would change the risk profile of the application.   6) Risk of industry The risk of an industry in which the SME operates can have a strong deterministic relationship with the entity being able to service the debt. Some lenders use this and those who do not normally identify this as a missing element in their risk assessment process. The identification of industry is always important. If you are in manufacturing, but your clients are the mines, then you are perhaps better identified as operating in mining as opposed to manufacturing. Most lenders who assess industry, will periodically rule out certain industries and perhaps also incorporate industry within their scorecard. Others take a more scientific approach. In the graph below the performance of an industry is tracked for two years and then projected over the next 6 months; this is then compared to the country’s GDP. As the industry appears to track above the projected GDP, a positive outlook is given to this applicant and this may affect them favourably in the credit application.                   7) Risk of Region   The last area of assessment is risk of region. Of the seven, this one is used the least. Here businesses,  either on book or on the bureau, are assessed against their geo-code. Each geo-code is clustered, and the projected outlook is given as positive, static or negative. As with industry this can be used within the assessment process as a policy rule or within a scorecard.   Bringing the seven risk categories together in a risk assessment These seven risk assessment categories are all important in the risk assessment process. How you bring it all together is critical. If you would like to discuss your SME evaluation challenges or find out more about what we offer in credit management software (like AppSmart and DecisionSmart), get in touch with us here.

Collections Resilience post COVID-19 - part 2

Principa Decisions (Pty) L

Collections Resilience post COVID-19

Principa Decisions (Pty) L