The Data Analytics Blog

Our news and views relating to Data Analytics, Big Data, Machine Learning, and the world of Credit.

All Posts

All You Need To Know About Randomisation In The Credit Lifecycle

February 2, 2017 at 4:48 PM

If you’re involved in credit risk and existing customer marketing you’ll know that random numbers are frequently used when deploying different strategies.  As strategies grow more complex and numerous, so the role of the random number grows more important. In this blog post, I’ll cover what randomisation is, why you should do it, when you should do it and what else to consider.

In credit and existing customer marketing, a critical component in deploying a new strategy is ensuring that results can be clearly measured against a previous strategy. This is done through a scientific test-and-learn process known as champion / challenger testing.  Here one random population receives one action (champion) and another random population receives another (typically new) action (challenger).  The process is similar to how pharmaceuticals test new drugs known as “randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled” trials.

A key principal in champion / challenger testing is to ensure that when one is comparing two strategies, one is comparing like-versus-like.  That means the two populations should look very similar.  We ensure this through a process of randomly allocating the population to two different groups (“randomisation”)

Typical examples of Champion / Challenger strategies across the credit life-cycle include:

  • Originations: New scorecards and policy rules, sensitivity to interest-rates, lower / higher, loan / limit amounts, automated / manual decisions.
  • Account Management: Credit-limit increase / decreases, authorisations, card re-pricing, and pre-delinquency.
  • Marketing: Testing cross-sell / up-sell and targeted campaigns, and testing channels.
  • Collections: Testing different account prioritisations, settlement optimisation, right-time-to-call, and agency-allocation.

In complex environments, such as account management where multiple tests are required, the use of more than one random number is becoming crucial.  As strategies get more complex (for example through deploying mathematical optimisation where many combinations of strategies might be tested), so the need for champion / challenger testing grows.

How is randomisation done in originations?

In originations we don’t know what type of application we will get when, so typically random numbers are allocated sequentially or through the use of a random-number generator. These random numbers are normally integers between 00 and 99. 

Multiple random numbers might be allocated if multiple originations tests are required. If multiple random numbers are allocated a more complex system is required (see below). 

How is randomisation done in other decision areas (or complex originations)?

In account management the process is different.  A new account entering the account processor for the first time will be allocated a random number or multiple random numbers.  For “multiple random numbers” the numbers also need to be independent in relation to each other.  For this, a random number generator is used. This generator produces sets of two, three or four numbers that are independent to each other and also, as each set is allocated to accounts, they result in each number having a random distribution between 00 and 99.  Principa has built such a system for clients to produce up to four random numbers to be deployed in a COBOL, JAVA or .Net environment. 

Ensuring randomisation remains effective: Re-randomising your book

Once random numbers are issued on an existing book, over time one finds that the random groups lose their “smoothness”.  If, for example, one uses one set of Random Digit Groups, or RDGs, for a conservative strategy of limit increases and another set for an aggressive strategy, over time the second group will likely end up with higher average balances and limits than the first group.  This would mean that any new champion/ challenger tests could break the like-versus-like rule and therefore not be “true” tests. Re-randomisation is therefore important - ideally it should be an annual event, but one should always be aware of any additional tests that might be currently running.  It should ideally be run at the end of a test-and-learn process when the new champions are “crowned” – i.e. the results of the tests are measured and a new strategy is adopted.

How do you re-randomise?

Re-randomising is an iterative process that involves the following key steps:

1. Understand your testing environment

  • What tests are being planned over which decision areas?
  • How many random numbers can the account management system support?
  • Can the reporting identify champion/challenger groups?
  • How many random numbers will need to be produced based on answers to the above? 

 2 Identify your exclusions

Certain accounts you may wish to exclude from tests, particularly if they are treated or have been treated differently, for example:

  • Staff accounts
  • VIPs
  • Accounts with unusually high limits or balances (these will skew the smoothing process)

3. Extract the full book to be re-randomised

4. Allocate random numbers to entire book

(These numbers need to be independently random from each other)

5. Test each random group across each key metric to ensure smoothness (see box below)

6. Either:

  • If distributions are uneven, then go back to step 4
  • If distributions are “smooth” then upload new random digits to accounts in the host (account processing) system

Steps 4 - 6 can take some time, but the process is important.

Typical examples of Champion / Challenger strategies across the credit life-cycle include:

  • Similar number of accounts in each Random Digit Group (RDG),
  • Similar distribution of limits, balances, delinquent accounts, over-limit accounts , utilisation%, dormant accounts across RDGs,
  • For marketing communications – checking customer cluster distribution would also be critical, and
  • Similar distributions across each combination of RDGs.

With a fully randomised (“smoothed”) population, credit and marketing analysts can have confidence that running tests using the RDGs will produce true tests.  Randomisation is an important process to understand the best actions to take for the most profitable decisions.

Principa’s key randomisation services include.

  • Random number generators,
  • The set-up of a random allocation scheme, and
  • Re-randomisation.

To find out how Principa can help with your randomisation needs get in touch for a chat!

Debtor Profile and Treatment Framework infographic

Image credit: Shutterstock

Thomas Maydon
Thomas Maydon
Thomas Maydon is the Head of Credit Solutions at Principa. With over 17 years of experience in the Southern African, West African and Middle Eastern retail credit markets, Tom has primarily been involved in consulting, analytics, credit bureau and predictive modelling services. He has experience in all aspects of the credit life cycle (in multiple industries) including intelligent prospecting, originations, strategy simulation, affordability analysis, behavioural modelling, pricing analysis, collections processes, and provisions (including Basel II) and profitability calculations.

Latest Posts

The 7 types of credit risk in SME lending

  It is common knowledge in the industry that the credit risk assessment of a consumer applying for credit is far less complex than that of a business that is applying for credit. Why is this the case? Simply put, consumers are usually very similar in their requirements and risks (homogenous) whilst businesses have far more varying risk elements (heterogenous). In this blog we will look at all the different risk elements within a business (here SME) credit application. These are: Risk of proprietors Risk of business Reason for loan Financial ratios Size of loan Risk industry Risk of region Before we delve into this list, it is worth noting that all of these factors need to be deployable as assessment tools within your originations system so it is key that you ensure your system can manage them. If you are on the look out for a loans origination system, then look no further than Principa’s AppSmart. If you are looking for a decision engine to manage your scorecards, policy rules and terms of business then take a look at our DecisionSmart business rules engine. AppSmart and DecisionSmart are part of Principa’s FinSmart Universe allowing for effective credit management across the customer life-cycle.   The different risk elements within a business credit application 1) Risk of proprietors For smaller organisations the risk of the business is inextricably linked to the financial well-being of the proprietors. How small is small? The rule of thumb is companies with up to two to three proprietors should have their proprietors assessed for risk too. This fits in with the SME segment. What data should be looked at? Generally in countries with mature credit bureaux, credit data is looked at including the score (there is normally a score cut-off) and then negative information such as the existence of judgements or defaults; these are typically used within policy rules. Those businesses with proprietors with excessive numbers of “negatives” may be disqualified from the loan application. Some credit bureaux offer a score of an individual based on the performance of all the businesses with which they are associated. This can also be useful in the credit risk assessment process. Another innovation being adopted internationally is the use of psychometrics in credit evaluation of the proprietors. To find out more about adopting credit scoring, read our blog on how to adopt credit scoring.   2) Risk of business The risk of the business should be managed through both scores and policy rules. Lenders will look at information such as the age of company, the experience of directors and the size of company etc. within a score. Alternatively, many lenders utilise the business score offered by credit bureaux. These scores are typically not as strong as consumer scores as the underlying data is limited and sometimes problematic. For example, large successful organisations may have judgements registered against their name which, unlike for consumers, is not necessarily a direct indication of the inability to service debt.   3) Reason for loan The reason for a loan is used more widely in business lending as opposed to unsecured consumer lending. Venture capital, working capital, invoice discounting and bridging finance are just some of many types of loan/facilities available and lenders need to equip themselves with the ability to manage each of these customer types whether it is within originations or collections. Prudent lenders venturing into the SME space for the first time often focus on one or two of these loan types and then expand later – as the operational implication for each type of loan is complex.   4) Financial ratios Financial ratios are core to commercial credit risk assessment. The main challenge here is to ensure that reliable financials are available from the customer. Small businesses may not be audited and thus the financials may be less trustworthy. Financial ratios can be divided into four categories: Profitability Leverage Coverage Liquidity Profitability can be further divided into margin ratios and return ratios. Lenders are frequently interested in gross profit margins; this is normally explicit on the income statement. The EBIDTA margin and operating profit margins are also used as well as return ratios such as return on assets, return on equity and risk-adjusted-returns. Leverage ratios are useful to lenders as they reflect the portion of the business that is financed by debt. Lower leverage ratios indicate stability. Leverage ratios assessed often incorporate debt-to-asset, debt-to-equity and asset-to-equity. Coverage ratios indicate the coverage that income or assets provide for the servicing of debt or interest expenses. The higher the coverage ratio the better it is for the lender. Coverage ratios are worked out considering the loan/facility that is being applied for. Finally, liquidity ratios indicate the ability for a company to convert its assets into cash. There are a variety of ratios used here. The current ratio is simply the ratio of assets to liabilities. The quick ratio is the ability for the business to pay its current debts off with readily available assets. The higher the liquidity ratios the better. Ratios are used both within credit scorecards as well as within policy rules. You can read more about these ratios here.   5) Size of loan When assessing credit risk for a consumer, the risk of the consumer does not normally change with the change of loan amount or facility (subject to the consumer passing affordability criteria). With business loans, loan amounts can range quite dramatically, and the risk of the applicant is normally tied to the loan amount requested. The loan/facility amount will of course change the ratios (mentioned in the last section) which could affect a positive/negative outcome. The outcome of the loan application is usually directly linked to a loan amount and any marked change to this loan amount would change the risk profile of the application.   6) Risk of industry The risk of an industry in which the SME operates can have a strong deterministic relationship with the entity being able to service the debt. Some lenders use this and those who do not normally identify this as a missing element in their risk assessment process. The identification of industry is always important. If you are in manufacturing, but your clients are the mines, then you are perhaps better identified as operating in mining as opposed to manufacturing. Most lenders who assess industry, will periodically rule out certain industries and perhaps also incorporate industry within their scorecard. Others take a more scientific approach. In the graph below the performance of an industry is tracked for two years and then projected over the next 6 months; this is then compared to the country’s GDP. As the industry appears to track above the projected GDP, a positive outlook is given to this applicant and this may affect them favourably in the credit application.                   7) Risk of Region   The last area of assessment is risk of region. Of the seven, this one is used the least. Here businesses,  either on book or on the bureau, are assessed against their geo-code. Each geo-code is clustered, and the projected outlook is given as positive, static or negative. As with industry this can be used within the assessment process as a policy rule or within a scorecard.   Bringing the seven risk categories together in a risk assessment These seven risk assessment categories are all important in the risk assessment process. How you bring it all together is critical. If you would like to discuss your SME evaluation challenges or find out more about what we offer in credit management software (like AppSmart and DecisionSmart), get in touch with us here.

Collections Resilience post COVID-19 - part 2

Principa Decisions (Pty) L

Collections Resilience post COVID-19

Principa Decisions (Pty) L