The Data Analytics Blog

Our news and views relating to Data Analytics, Big Data, Machine Learning, and the world of Credit.

All Posts

Right-Party-Connect Rates In 2018

September 22, 2017 at 1:19 PM

Collection Cascade

When looking at the collections cascade and it’s diminishing returns, we always emphasis the responsibility factor relating to each metrics. Whom is responsible for these areas, and how do we monitor the accuracy of these metric results?

If we take a closer look at the right-party-connect rates, you'll notice several dispositions that occur regarding this metric:

  • RPC KPI’s for collection agents
  • Manual logging of RPC’s and subsequent impact
  • Quality Assurance monitoring of RPC’s
  1. Right-party-connect is a direct result from available data, analytic insights/models and dialler strategies, but we still see companies including RPC as a KPI for collections agents. This is concerning due to an agent having no influence if the right-party answers a telephone call or not. RPC outcomes are only as good as the data and strategy used. If your company uses RPC as an agent KPI, how sure are you that the logging of RPC’s is accurate? Remember, agents always find a way of manipulating outcomes to suit their needs.
  2. If we look at how we log a RPC in our operating systems, we can all agree that for the most it is still a manual action by an agent. But is this really optimal, and what is the risks associated with these manual actions? Even though we may not assess agent KPI’s on RPC outcomes, we still assess their conversion of a RPC to a promise-to-pay (PTP). We know that agents can very quickly find a way of manipulating outcomes to suit their needs. So how comfortable are we in the accuracy of our agents’ negotiation outcomes, knowing that there is still room for manipulation?
  3. I recently had a conversation with a colleague regarding their comfort around their QA process and the validity of the outcome. What QA penetration % on calls would you feel is sufficient to draw conclusions from? Would you bet your money on the validity of that penetration? % NO... And I agree fully.

We all know that most companies penetrate less than 0.5% of all calls, and with those odds we are very far from being comfortable to draw any concrete conclusions to influence strategy.

What if we could penetrate 100% of all our calls, would that change the face of our RPC outcomes? Would that result in a focus shift?

Looking at where the collections solutions are going in terms of data analytics, machine learning, AI agents and voice analytics – isn’t it important to completely take the RPC metric away from the call centre agent and their ability to manipulate it?

Let’s start talking about voice biometrics and the importance of it within the operational call centre...

increase your collection and recovery yields

Perry de Jager
Perry de Jager
Perry has been involved in Collections and Recoveries for the past 12 years, spending time in different market segments ranging from law firms to investment companies. At Principa, Perry has worked on extended projects within both South Africa and the Middle East with some of the largest financial organisation, providing on-site consulting within the collections and recoveries space covering strategy, process, people and technology.

Latest Posts

[Slideshare] How To Make Your Business Data Work For You

Common barriers to success: Skills shortage: data scientists are in high demand and in low supply. Companies lack the skills to develop advanced data analytics or machine learning applications. Cost: recruiting and building up or training a team, as well as infrastructure costs are immense. Inefficiency and low ROI on: acquisition campaigns; re-activation and retention campaigns; outbound sales calls and debt collection. Resulting in: No or ineffective use of data. High cost to get insights from data. Low returns from campaigns. What’s the alternative? Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS): removes infrastructure skills and requirements for machine learning, allowing you to begin benefiting from machine learning quickly with little investment. Subscription based pricing, allowing you to benefit using machine learning while minimising your set-up costs and seeing returns sooner. Answers as a Service: Use historic data and machine learning to allow answers to increase in accuracy with time. MLaaS with predictive models pre-developed to answers specific questions: Genius Call Connect: What is the best time and number to call customers? Genius Customer Growth: Which customers are most likely to respond to cross-sell? Genius Re-activation: Which dormant customers are worth re-activating? Genius Customer Retention: Which customers are most likely to churn? Genius Leads: Which contacts are likely to respond to my campaign? Genius Risk Classifier: Which debtors are most likely to pay or roll? Benefits of Genius: Quick and cost-effective ability to leverage machine learning: Minimal set-up time Minimal involvement from IT Subscription based service Looking to make your data work for your business? Read more on Genius to see how it can help your business succeed. 

5 Must-Join Facebook Pages For Data Science, Machine Learning And Artificial Intelligence In 2019

While LinkedIn has traditionally been thought of as the business or work focussed social platform, Facebook has been making headway into gaining market share in the space as well. With company pages and groups, Facebook is catering to every interest and aspiration that people might have – and combining that with their social interactions and news sources. Facebook aims to give users a one-stop-shop experience, and it’s very good at doing it.

Our 2018 Customer Acquisition And Engagement Blog Roundup

Our final roundup this year covers two of our main topics: customer acquisition and customer engagement. We’ve not covered these topics in depth this year, and so decided to combine these two to provide a roundup of the best of both.