The Data Analytics Blog

Our news and views relating to Data Analytics, Big Data, Machine Learning, and the world of Credit.

All Posts

Three Things Successful Loyalty Programs Are Doing Right

August 27, 2015 at 7:42 AM

In my eyes, loyalty programs exist for two simple reasons: to motivate increased engagement with your brand and to collect data in order to build deep customer understanding. But they also exist for a third reason: customers want them. In a study by Nielsen, 84% of respondents said they were more likely to choose retailers that offered a loyalty program. Forrester Research have found that 64% of consumers agree that loyalty programs influence where they make purchases, and 50% agree that loyalty programs influence what they buy.

However, despite growth in membership numbers across loyalty programs, consumers are engaged in fewer than half of the loyalty programs they belong to. It appears that the will of the consumer to engage is there, but many loyalty programs are failing to drive that engagement.  To understand what they are doing wrong, let’s look at what some brands that are succeeding are doing right.

They’re collecting and using customer data

Insights gleaned from customer data analysis place you in a favourable position to build programs that are relevant to customers. Customer analytics enables customer segmentation, targeting and offer management, so that your brand becomes more relevant to customers.

According to a recent study by McKinsey & Company, intensive business users of customer analytics are nine times more likely to outperform their competitors in terms of customer loyalty. When the data is there, use it to become your customers’ “go-to” brand for your particular market segment by becoming the brand that knows your customer best.

Read about how four loyalty leaders are succeeding by using data here.

They’re connecting on an emotional level

According to Forrester Research, strategies that rely purely on loyalty programs that offer points and discounts miss an opportunity to drive deeper engagement through emotional loyalty. Loyalty initiatives must evolve beyond points-based programs to recognise and measure both the behavioural and emotional drivers of loyalty.

One way brands can connect with consumers on an emotional level is by incorporating social awareness initiatives that are aligned with customers’ values and beliefs into loyalty programs. The sense of making a difference together instils commitment to your brand that the competition would kill for. But here’s the thing: one man’s social cause is another’s after-thought, and this brings it back to customer data analysis. Brands need to know what their customers care about and make a genuine effort to speak to those causes. Supporting a cause that your customers don’t care about may elevate the perception of your brand in the market, but it won’t drive loyalty (and more sales) from within your existing base - a point that the well-known Pepsi Refresh campaign has driven home.

Get more examples of how to create that emotional connection with customers here.

They’re constantly evolving and innovating

According to Forrester Research, companies that take a “set-it-and-forget-it” approach to their loyalty strategies will fail. Forrester recommends using your data and moving quickly on a data-driven idea. It’s ok to fail, but if you must, fail fast and cheaply by starting small to test, measure and learn. 

Amazon’s subscription based loyalty program, Amazon Prime, offers a great example of an innovative loyalty program thatuses data insights to increase relevance, engagement and sales. Established in early 2005, Amazon Prime charges an annual fee of $ 99 to belong to their loyalty program. Charge customers to join a loyalty program? That’s innovative. And it works because they offer enough value in return (free shipping), it removes friction from the buying process (the cost of shipping) which drives more sales, and the fee is high enough that people won’t forget to make use of this program. They are motivated to shop more at Amazon, so that they get their money back on their loyalty program fee investment.  

As a result, Amazon customers belonging to their Prime program end up spending on average $ 1,500 per year versus about $ 625 per year for non-members.  Amazon claims that 50% of their customers in the US now belong to their paid loyalty program, and it’s cited as one of the main reasons for their impressive reported profits this year. Amazon have kept evolving this program by offering more benefits to members, such as free video streaming and photo storage, which in turn helps them increase retention to their program (you have all of your photos stored with them) and deepen customer understanding through tracking of media consumption. This, in addition to tracking their browsing and purchase behaviour, helps them improve their predictive product recommendations, which makes them more engaging and relevant to customers.

Read about other companies that are innovating and evolving their loyalty programs here.

Build your brand and they will come

Building something as important - and fickle - as brand loyalty requires companies to step outside of their comfort zones, stop preaching to customers about what’s good for them and start listening. Use data to learn, understand, and innovate. Then make sure to start small, trial and build on your lessons learned and insights gained. With volumes of data at the fingertips of modern marketers and loyalty experts, there’s no excuse to get caught in the headlights.

using data analytics for customer engagement

Image source: 

Julian Diaz
Julian Diaz
Julian Diaz was Head of Marketing for Principa until 2017, after which he became Head of Marketing for Honeybee CRM. American born and raised, Julian has worked in the IT industry for over 20 years. Having begun his career at a major software company in Germany, Julian made the move to South Africa in 1998 when he joined Dimension Data and later MWEB (leading South African ISP). Since then, Julian has helped launch various South African technology brands into international markets, including Principa.

Latest Posts

The 7 types of credit risk in SME lending

  It is common knowledge in the industry that the credit risk assessment of a consumer applying for credit is far less complex than that of a business that is applying for credit. Why is this the case? Simply put, consumers are usually very similar in their requirements and risks (homogenous) whilst businesses have far more varying risk elements (heterogenous). In this blog we will look at all the different risk elements within a business (here SME) credit application. These are: Risk of proprietors Risk of business Reason for loan Financial ratios Size of loan Risk industry Risk of region Before we delve into this list, it is worth noting that all of these factors need to be deployable as assessment tools within your originations system so it is key that you ensure your system can manage them. If you are on the look out for a loans origination system, then look no further than Principa’s AppSmart. If you are looking for a decision engine to manage your scorecards, policy rules and terms of business then take a look at our DecisionSmart business rules engine. AppSmart and DecisionSmart are part of Principa’s FinSmart Universe allowing for effective credit management across the customer life-cycle.  The different risk elements within a business credit application 1) Risk of proprietors For smaller organisations the risk of the business is inextricably linked to the financial well-being of the proprietors. How small is small? The rule of thumb is companies with up to two to three proprietors should have their proprietors assessed for risk too. This fits in with the SME segment. What data should be looked at? Generally in countries with mature credit bureaux, credit data is looked at including the score (there is normally a score cut-off) and then negative information such as the existence of judgements or defaults; these are typically used within policy rules. Those businesses with proprietors with excessive numbers of “negatives” may be disqualified from the loan application. Some credit bureaux offer a score of an individual based on the performance of all the businesses with which they are associated. This can also be useful in the credit risk assessment process. Another innovation being adopted internationally is the use of psychometrics in credit evaluation of the proprietors. To find out more about adopting credit scoring, read our blog on how to adopt credit scoring.   2) Risk of business The risk of the business should be managed through both scores and policy rules. Lenders will look at information such as the age of company, the experience of directors and the size of company etc. within a score. Alternatively, many lenders utilise the business score offered by credit bureaux. These scores are typically not as strong as consumer scores as the underlying data is limited and sometimes problematic. For example, large successful organisations may have judgements registered against their name which, unlike for consumers, is not necessarily a direct indication of the inability to service debt.   3) Reason for loan The reason for a loan is used more widely in business lending as opposed to unsecured consumer lending. Venture capital, working capital, invoice discounting and bridging finance are just some of many types of loan/facilities available and lenders need to equip themselves with the ability to manage each of these customer types whether it is within originations or collections. Prudent lenders venturing into the SME space for the first time often focus on one or two of these loan types and then expand later – as the operational implication for each type of loan is complex. 4) Financial ratios Financial ratios are core to commercial credit risk assessment. The main challenge here is to ensure that reliable financials are available from the customer. Small businesses may not be audited and thus the financials may be less trustworthy.   Financial ratios can be divided into four categories: Profitability Leverage Coverage Liquidity Profitability can be further divided into margin ratios and return ratios. Lenders are frequently interested in gross profit margins; this is normally explicit on the income statement. The EBIDTA margin and operating profit margins are also used as well as return ratios such as return on assets, return on equity and risk-adjusted-returns. Leverage ratios are useful to lenders as they reflect the portion of the business that is financed by debt. Lower leverage ratios indicate stability. Leverage ratios assessed often incorporate debt-to-asset, debt-to-equity and asset-to-equity. Coverage ratios indicate the coverage that income or assets provide for the servicing of debt or interest expenses. The higher the coverage ratio the better it is for the lender. Coverage ratios are worked out considering the loan/facility that is being applied for. Finally, liquidity ratios indicate the ability for a company to convert its assets into cash. There are a variety of ratios used here. The current ratio is simply the ratio of assets to liabilities. The quick ratio is the ability for the business to pay its current debts off with readily available assets. The higher the liquidity ratios the better. Ratios are used both within credit scorecards as well as within policy rules. You can read more about these ratios here. 5) Size of loan When assessing credit risk for a consumer, the risk of the consumer does not normally change with the change of loan amount or facility (subject to the consumer passing affordability criteria). With business loans, loan amounts can range quite dramatically, and the risk of the applicant is normally tied to the loan amount requested. The loan/facility amount will of course change the ratios (mentioned in the last section) which could affect a positive/negative outcome. The outcome of the loan application is usually directly linked to a loan amount and any marked change to this loan amount would change the risk profile of the application.   6) Risk of industry The risk of an industry in which the SME operates can have a strong deterministic relationship with the entity being able to service the debt. Some lenders use this and those who do not normally identify this as a missing element in their risk assessment process. The identification of industry is always important. If you are in manufacturing, but your clients are the mines, then you are perhaps better identified as operating in mining as opposed to manufacturing. Most lenders who assess industry, will periodically rule out certain industries and perhaps also incorporate industry within their scorecard. Others take a more scientific approach. In the graph below the performance of an industry is tracked for two years and then projected over the next 6 months; this is then compared to the country’s GDP. As the industry appears to track above the projected GDP, a positive outlook is given to this applicant and this may affect them favourably in the credit application.                   7) Risk of Region   The last area of assessment is risk of region. Of the seven, this one is used the least. Here businesses,  either on book or on the bureau, are assessed against their geo-code. Each geo-code is clustered, and the projected outlook is given as positive, static or negative. As with industry this can be used within the assessment process as a policy rule or within a scorecard.   Bringing the seven risk categories together in a risk assessment These seven risk assessment categories are all important in the risk assessment process. How you bring it all together is critical. If you would like to discuss your SME evaluation challenges or find out more about what we offer in credit management software (like AppSmart and DecisionSmart), get in touch with us here.

Collections Resilience post COVID-19 - part 2

Principa Decisions (Pty) L

Collections Resilience post COVID-19

Principa Decisions (Pty) L